Showing posts with label Sonoma County. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sonoma County. Show all posts

17 Oct 2011

Sirah that aint Petite (Dry Creek & Alexander Valleys, California)

My second day in Sonoma County had me heading further North into the Dry Creek Valley. As the name suggests the climate is a lot drier and warmer with quite cool nights. If I were to compare it to a region in Australia, it would be similar to Bendigo. The two most important varieties here are zinfandel, that classic California grape, and petite sirah. It wasn't until I came to Dry Creek that I was reminded that petite sirah is another name for durif, the famous Rutherglen grape. This made a lot of sense and of course I felt a bit silly for forgetting.

Breakfast of champions
Having visited Ridge Vineyards Montebello South of San Francisco, I was keen to visit the Lytton Springs winery to try some more wines. At Lytton Springs they naturally produce zinfandel, but they specialise in single-vineyard expressions of zinfandel, and commonly blend other varieties with it. The wines are all priced well, and are very well-made, apart from one minor thing. I found them to be generally hot with alcohol. The interesting thing about this is the fact that I have tried wines thus far that have had higher levels of alcohol that haven't appeared hot. I'm not sure what it was about many of the Ridge zinfandel based wines, perhaps they didn't have the fruit to support the alcohol, but they were hot and a tad extractively course. As you can imagine this was disappointing after having such a profound experience at the Montebello vineyard.

Ridge Lytton Springs

Ridge Lytton Springs vineyards
Just down the road is Dry Creek Vineyard, the first commercial winery to be established after Prohibition in 1972. It is still a second-generation family owned and operated winery that was originally inspired by the chateaus of the Loire Valley in France. The labels of the wines almost ironically have images of sailboats on the ocean. The wines themselves are very solid performers, representing value for money, but I felt they were very safe wines. Whilst they have a significant pedigree, and I admire the fact they are still family owned, the wines are very clean and straightforward. The chenin blanc and merlot were pretty good, but otherwise nothing to get excited about.

Dry Creek Vineyards
The previous day I had been recommended to visit Mounts Family Winery to try authentic expressions of zinfandel and petite sirah. Mounts have been growing grapes expertly in the Dry Creek Valley for 60 years, selling their fruit off. They now set aside about 20% of their harvest to make wines themselves, and they are most definitely authentic. The wines are big, and I mean huge. Ripe and extractive, quite alcoholic and bold. And yet they manage to hold everything together, I can't really explain how. The syrah rose is the best rose I have tried here, bone-dry and slightly savoury. The grenache is in the rich Barossa style, the cabernet is a powerhouse and the petite sirah would put Rutherglen to shame. I like the understatement and the willingness to make wines in this style, trends be damned. Whilst they might not be the kind I would choose from a wine list to go with food, they are good wines and shouldn't be embarrassed about it.

Mounts Family Winery

Mounts range
A. Rafanelli have been around for over 100 years in Sonoma, growing grapes that for many years went into jug wine, like most of Sonoma. It wasn't until the 1970s that they began making their own wines for commercial sale, and they focused on three varieties; zinfandel, merlot and cabernet sauvignon. The wines have a cult following, with a 1 year waiting list to purchase. They only take appointments to taste (which they interestingly don't charge for, one of the only ones), and they don't read emails so don't bother sending them. The wines are as robust and bold as any other I have tried in California (or Australia for that matter), but they have a really nice balance and layers of complexity. The cabernet in particular is very dense and dark, but would age exceptionally well. The rustic charm of this winery is undeniable, and it could easily be dropped in Tuscany and not feel out of place.

A. Rafanelli vineyards

A. Rafanelli tasting room
Before heading to Mendocino I poked my head in at a really cool Dry Creek Valley commune of tasting rooms. They are mostly very boutique operations, producing less than 5,000 cases, so I was intrigued. The first I visited was a winery named Papapietro Perry, which is quite a mouthful, try and say that after a bottle of wine. Specialising in small-lot wines from numerous sub-appelations, their key variety is pinot noir. I was mightily impressed with the pinots, but I think they had the best zinfandel I've ever tasted. It was very delicate and savoury, an actual food-friendly zin! It's possible that my preference for elegant cooler-climate wines may have clouded my judgement, but I'd been tasting all day so leave me alone! The other winery I checked out was named Kokomo, which make very honest expressions of regional wines that you'd never quibble over the price. It's a friendly tasting room in the actual winery, but this time of year tends to attract the fruit flies which are a nuisance!

Kokomo winery and tasting room
Click here to see more photos from Day Two of Sonoma County, California

16 Oct 2011

This is more like it (Chalk Hill & Russian River Valley, California)

Driving up through the Sonoma Valley towards Santa Rosa, it was good to be out of the Napa Valley. Not that it wasn't nice, it's just wall to wall vines and a winery every 250m. Being out in Carneros and Sonoma Valley was a return to terroir, with actual site selection for planting and smaller, more understated wineries and tasting rooms. It isn't until you continue North into Sonoma County you realise how beautiful this part of California is, and although it is as busy as Napa from a tourism perspective, the roads aren't chock-a-block with cars as the region is more spread out, with larger sub-regions. The sub-regions of Sonoma are the Russian River Valley (home of pinot noir and chardonnay), Dry Creek Valley (home of zinfandel and petite sirah), and Chalk Hill and Alexander Valley (home of everything else).

Rodney Strong Vineyards
Sonoma County is a big area to cover, and doesn't even include Sonoma Valley, so it was a shame I was only there for two days. The first place I visited was in the Chalk Hill AVA, and was recommended to me by someone on Twitter. Rodney Strong Vineyards has a first class tasting room with a self-guided tour around the winery which explains the entire winemaking process and gives a great overview of the Sonoma history. The fruit for the wine comes from throughout Sonoma County, and are clearly the best sites for the specific varieties/blends. The style of the wine is consistent with Californian wine being fruit forward but they have a nice restraint and balance to them, particularly the Bordeaux varieties. There are several single vineyard cabernet sauvignons which are excellent, and make you wonder why you would pay so much for some Napa Valley cabernets. Rodney Strong is a sustainable business, and have a large bank of solar panels which completely power the winery.

Copain tasting room
Having almost no experience with Californian wines in Australia makes it difficult to know which wineries to visit; it's not as if they are imported in great volume and there are experts in Australia I could ask. This means than I am mostly going on recommendations from the locals, and therefore I visited Copain on recommendation from my host at Rodney Strong. Copain is a very small operation focusing on single vineyard expressions of the Mendocino region. The wines were quite exceptional and were certainly more elegant than I had come to expect from Californian wines. The pinot noirs in particular impressed me, and served to make me look forward to visiting Mendocino even more. My only regret in visiting Copain was that I was only in Sonoma County for two days so was more interested in trying wines from that region. It's always good to try high-quality wines though.

Copain wine tasting
Rochioli Vineyards & Winery is a third-generation family owned and operated Russian River Valley winery, which harks back to post-Prohibition era 1938. The oldest vines interestingly enough, are the sauvignon blanc vines, and produce a very sought-after wine which sells out in a few months each year. Rochioli only produce a few estate grown wines from four varieties, which include a chardonnay, a pinot noir and a house blend of zinfandel and petite sirah. They are all very good expressions of site, and surprisingly good value. The tasting room is lovely and the staff there are very welcoming and warm. They were nice enough to call ahead to a winery for the next day who are appointment only and don't read emails, so you have to call them.

Rochioli winery
The next winery I visited sort of confirmed a rumour I heard a while ago, but couldn't really believe. I had heard that there were wineries in California who were intentionally introducing or encouraging the fungal disease Brettanomyces (Brett) to give their wines an aged and/or old-world quality. Brett is generally considered a fault as it can dull the fruit in wine and give the aromas and flavours a slightly band-aid sour quality. In small quantities it can be considered a complex character, but for very precise and clean palates in the Australian wine industry it is almost always detected as a faulty wine.

I don't want to name the winery, but it was in the Russian River and most of the wines were good, classic Californian styles. The pinot noirs across two vintages were introduced as having Brett added, which shocked me a bit. To my nose they were obviously faulty, and to use this as a selling point was a little distressing. When I enquired as to the introduction of Brett into the wine, they said it wasn't introduced, but it wasn't eliminated either. The discussion related to the complex quality of French wines, which to an extent I agree with these wines have Brett in them, but it is a lot less common now that better practices in hygiene have been introduced. To suggest that these wines were more complex because of the presence of Brett I found slightly offensive, and was very disappointed that it reflected poorly on their neighbours who were making very clean and commercially sound wines. Controversial to say the least.

Sandy soils in Kistler Vineyards
My final visit for the day will probably be one of the most memorable of my entire trip. Kistler Vineyards are a cult icon producer in California, and have been compared to Burgundy on numerous occasions. They are famous enough that I have had the opportunity to try their wines twice in Australia, one of the only Californian whites I had ever tried. The winery was established in 1978 by Steve Kistler as Winemaker/Viticulturalist and Mark Bixler as General Manager, and quickly established a reputation for producing some of the best chardonnay in California. Depending on vintage there are as many as 12 different wines, mostly single-vineyard wines made from a careful selection of the best parcels and barrels. The winery itself is state-of-the-art, sparing no expense. They only use indigenous yeasts in the fermentation process, use the finest fine grained French oak (mostly from Francois Freres), and ferment the pinot noir wines in small batch open-top fermenters. The vineyard on which the current winery is built is on a rootstock not resistant to phylloxera as the sandy soils prevent it living in the soils.

Kitsler winery
Mark Bixler was generous enough to respond to the email I sent him, even though they are not open to the public. It was my good fortune that he had recently travelled to Australia and discovered many outstanding local pinot noirs and chardonnays, and was keen to chat with me about them in general. I was honoured to be invited to his house for dinner, which was awesome and filled with audio technology you would be more likely to see in a science fiction film. His cellar is a converted garage that he extended into the hill so it is underground, and he has an amazing collection, including an extensive range of Burgundian wines. He invited me to set aside anything I would be interested in trying, which flabbergasted and humbled me. I settled on such wines as a 2002 Guigal La Turque Cote Rotie, much to my protestation that it would be too young, but Mark insisted. Meanwhile he set aside some Kistler and other Californian wines.

Kitsler Cellars
We opened several wines and had a great deal to discuss about wine. Mark has had amazing experiences in his career and has met some amazing people. As I was driving I had to be careful not to drink too much, which was difficult as the wines were so good. There were several sauvignon blancs and blends that we looked at, several local and one Marlborough, which to me was a great example but still obviously Marlborough, which I had to justify that my patriotic genes meant I didn't get excited by it. Mark had pulled out several wines from a tiny producer from St. Helena in the Napa Valley named Morlet. They source fruit from key locations in Northen California to produce in small quantities Californian expressions of very French style wines. The La Proportion Doree is a traditional Bordeaux blend of sauvignon blanc, semillon and muscadelle, and is one of the more complete wines I have tried so far.

Some of the white wines we tasted
The Kistler wines themselves are unashamedly Californian, not trying to ape the French style by picking unripe fruit to make a more lean wine. The chardonnays are very rich of fruit and 100% malolactic fermentation, and have a lot of new oak. This does not make them heavy or buttery in the least, as the acids are more than capable of holding it all together. They are intense and complex, but have an elegance and balance not seen often in California. At a masterclass I attended in Melbourne before I left one of the Kistler single-vineyard wines was included, and was universally trashed by several prominent figures in the wine industry, as being an outdated over-oaked and overly-rich style. I found this assessment to be totally narrow-minded and wrong, as they are clearly an expression of the sun and warmth of the California coast, and also appeal to a different palate. The wine was being compared to very austere examples of Australian chardonnay that see very little oak and malo, and subsequently this wine was considered not as good. Not impressed guys...

A few of the red wines we tried
The Kistler Pinot Noir I tried was intense to say the least. It was a very dark colour, having some serious maceration from cold-soaking for several days. The nose was bold and fruity but not hot at all, something not uncommon in Central Otago pinots. On the palate it was not at all heavy, but quite soft and voluptuous. The fruit as expected was in the black forest and cherry region, but the 100% new oak was perfectly integrated. This is a big style of pinot that can only be produced in the new world, but an outstanding example. It was interesting to compare the Bergstrom Pinot Noir from the Willamette Valley with it, which showed more earthy savoury concentration. Now looking forward to Oregon as well...

It was pretty late by the time we sat down to dinner through all the tasting and talking. The dinner we enjoyed was welcome respite from all the meat and carbohydrates I had been having, as it was almost entirely organic vegetables and some cornmeal with shitake. The 2002 La Turque was indeed showing very young and tight, having some supple tannins but rocking neither Marks nor my world. After getting an introduction to Marks giant audio visual set-up I had to excuse myself as it was late and head back to my motel. It was a great evening of wine geekiness, and I felt privileged to have had the opportunity to meet him. If you ever have the opportunity to try Kistler wines I'm sure you'll understand how special they are.

Click here to see more photos from Day One in Sonoma County